The American “Pygmalion”

It’s an American version of Bernard Shaw’s classic Pygmalion – a play that many have seen in its musical form, My Fair Lady. For those who have not had the pleasure, it’s the story of Eliza Doolittle, a Cockney flower girl in London, England, and Henry Higgins, an arrogant professor of phonetics. Higgins bets a friend that, given a few months to train her to speak like the Queen, he can pass off the bawling flower girl as a duchess. This he does, though there are a few fashion items and mannerisms that get worked on, too.

As the song from My Fair Lady goes, “This verbal class distinction by now should be antique.” And increasingly, I have observed, it is.

However, in my two years of university teaching in the United States I have observed a remarkably similar phenomenon. As a text-dominated society, Americans seem to focus their verbal class distinction more on the written than the spoken word, though the latter is certainly important. The upshot is this: Those who can write clearly and grammatically, with access to a full and well-articulated vocabulary, are virtually assured of doing well in life.

And those who cannot? Their prospects are dim, unless perchance they excel in science and math. Given their educational background, however, this is also unlikely. Because the common element in most of their life stories is poorly funded public schools. And I mean really poorly funded, and getting worse as I write this, with legislatures finalizing their 2011 budgets by hacking more money from public education.

In my university classroom I see the results every day: students who can’t match a plural noun with a corresponding verb form, and don’t have the faintest idea what you mean when you point that out. Who have never heard of a pronoun matching its antecedent. Who can’t spot a word like “theirselves” as wrong on a grammar test. And who have tremendous difficulty expressing themselves coherently. I don’t need to ask what kind of previous schooling they have had. By their writing ye shall know them, to paraphrase Margaret Laurence’s iconic character, Christie Logan, in The Diviners.

The converse, I would expect, is also true: Those who articulately express their thoughts and dreams, marshaling fine vocabularies to do their bidding, almost always attended private schools – or those in affluent suburbs where public schools are virtually private, since no one of modest income can afford to live there.

This is, in my opinion, the American way – or perhaps just the Ohio way, since I have not really had a chance to observe other places – of keeping people in their place. I would really like to hear from people in other places about this issue.

The disparities in funding of public schools in Ohio, where I now live, are so great that they have thrice been ruled unconstitutional. Yet despite being ordered to fix this problem by their Supreme Court, Ohioans can’t seem to figure out how to deliver equal funding to their public schools. It’s such a thorny problem. It requires long division!

Let me say right here that I know many Ohioans, and Americans elsewhere too, who disagree with the way public schools are now funded and are actively working to change it. A coalition of churches in the greater Cleveland area has just voted to address this as their top issue in the coming year. It is not something people are ignoring. It’s just something they haven’t been able to solve.

Meanwhile, I’ll continue giving grammar texts to college students who should have learned all this stuff in elementary school, and who find it extremely difficult to undo bad grammar habits as this age. I just tell them the story of Eliza Dolittle. She did it. So can they.  And it will change their lives.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Why we continue to teach journalism

It’s a question I get asked all the time by my friends in the field: Why continue to teach journalism? There are so few jobs. Aren’t you just encouraging kids who will have their hopes dashed when they graduate?

In response to that question I have just written something for a blog called Media Minder, which is a joint effort by several journalism profs from small programs like the one I teach in – that is, as opposed to large journalism schools. I teach at a liberal arts college where my courses are included in the Communication and Theatre Arts department. Not everyone is planning to go into journalism when they graduate. Today, few are! And we make sure they have some other skills.

However, we continue to teach journalism despite the shortage of jobs, for a variety of important reasons. You can read about them in my Media Minder entry, which is dated Jan. 25, 2011.

Carrie Buchanan, John Carroll University

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Is Journalism Over?

The ramblings of a professor of journalism and its critical flip side, communication, this blog will focus on the basics we teach our students, why we teach them, and whether there’s any point to it any more. It will also explore “new media” – in particular, the idea of blogging, the use of blogs and the possibility that blogging is, or can be, journalism.

Just to get some definitions clear (Hey, I’m an academic, I must begin with definitions!), when communication is spelled with an “s” at the end, it means marketing-and-public-relations-type stuff. I don’t do that. Many fine people do, but I tend to see it as self-serving propaganda, which is the typical journalist’s view of the so-called “dark side.” I’m interested in communication without an “s” – it means a critical approach to media analysis. I call myself a critical media scholar, but I’m also a former journalist for a daily newspaper, a news junkie who loves the profession and sees it as indispensable to democracy.

So in response to the title of this blog, no, I hope and pray that journalism is not over but I’m not totally sure, for various reasons. Not all these reasons are related to the so-called demise of newspapers and network television that seems to be underway but could reverse itself if they just smarten up and get with the Internet. They do seem to be doing this, actually, so there is hope!

Many things assault journalism today. Journalism is always under assault. Someday it could die. In some countries it is basically dead today. But somehow, it seems to survive, revive, even thrive in some places. Let’s explore why, and how we instill in young people the desire – hey, the passion, ’cause they’re going to need that – to will it, like Tinkerbell, to survive.

This blog will document teaching experiences at a liberal arts college. My students’ and colleagues’ real names and identities will be protected. If you see a name in here, count on it, it’s a pseudonym. Also, because there are not enough hours in the day, week or year to actually do everything a tenure-track academic must do, I’m not going to promise a set schedule for entries into this blog. However, I often find myself learning things about teaching, students and media that I want to share. If I can dash off a blog post about it, perhaps someone else can benefit, and comments from others can bring me additional insights. I look forward to the interactivity of the blog, and to the task I’ve taken on: making the case that this is, or at least can be, a legitimate new form of journalism.

Thanks for listening.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment